Art. 0009 Rev. 1848 Hazard: phototoxic
Furanocoumarin
From Hogweed.org, the encyclopedia held in common
Contents
This article is about the class of plant compounds. For the burn they cause, see Phytophotodermatitis.
Furanocoumarins, or furocoumarins, are a class of plant compounds made of a furan ring fused to coumarin. They are harmless in the dark. In ultraviolet light they bind to DNA, and in skin that has touched them the result is a burn, phytophotodermatitis. They are the reason giant hogweed is dangerous.1
Furanocoumarins are made chiefly by four unrelated families of plants: the carrot family (Apiaceae), the citrus family (Rutaceae), the legumes (Fabaceae) and the figs (Moraceae).2 At least some of them invented the compounds independently of the others. The plants use them as a defence against insects and fungi, and the insects have answered with enzymes of their own, in a coevolutionary arms race that has been studied for half a century.3 People have used them for some 4,000 years to treat skin disease with sunlight,4 and meet them unknowingly in grapefruit juice, where they interfere with the action of more than 85 medicines.5
Structure
A furanocoumarin has three rings in a flat row: a benzene ring, a pyrone ring (together forming coumarin) and a five-membered furan ring. Where the furan is attached decides the shape.3
- In linear furanocoumarins the furan is fused at the 6 and 7 positions of the coumarin, and the molecule is straight. The parent is psoralen; its best-known derivatives are bergapten (5-methoxypsoralen, 5-MOP) and xanthotoxin (8-methoxypsoralen, 8-MOP, methoxsalen).
- In angular furanocoumarins the furan is fused at 7 and 8, and the molecule is bent. The parent is angelicin; its derivatives include isobergapten, sphondin and pimpinellin.
Two numbering systems are in use. In the traditional one, bergapten is 5-methoxypsoralen; in the systematic name of the fused ring system, the same carbon is number 4. The confusion is general in the literature.63 Estimates of how many natural furanocoumarins are known range from more than fifty to over two hundred, depending on who is counting.72
| Compound | Class | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Psoralen ficusin | linear | C11H6O3 |
| Bergapten 5-MOP, heraclin | linear | C12H8O4 |
| Xanthotoxin 8-MOP, methoxsalen | linear | C12H8O4 |
| Isopimpinellin 5,8-dimethoxypsoralen | linear | C13H10O5 |
| Imperatorin ammidin | linear | C16H14O4 |
| Angelicin isopsoralen | angular | C11H6O3 |
| Isobergapten 5-methoxyangelicin | angular | C12H8O4 |
| Sphondin 6-methoxyangelicin | angular | C12H8O4 |
| Pimpinellin 5,6-dimethoxyangelicin | angular | C13H10O5 |
In hogweed
Every giant hogweed makes both kinds. As early as 1976, a report of five people burned by giant hogweed on a clear day noted that it and 28 other species of Heracleum yield linear furanocoumarins;1 the genus as a whole has since yielded them from more than a hundred species.8
The amounts are large. In Sosnowsky’s hogweed collected in July 2021, four furanocoumarins together made up between 3.5 and 14.4 mg in every gram of fresh tissue, depending on the organ and the population. Flowers from the Moscow region were the richest, with 7.5 mg of xanthotoxin per gram, and reproductive organs generally held more than leaves.8 In the leaves of giant hogweed in Slovakia, angelicin rose from about 5.7 mg per gram of dry mass in April to 10–12 mg in June and July.9 An earlier study of giant hogweed found the most in the fruit, less in the leaves and least in the stem.10 Hot weather raises the dose: two days at 35 °C increased the xanthotoxin in the leaves of Sosnowsky’s hogweed by about 80 per cent.11
The hogweeds break a rule of the chemistry. Angular furanocoumarins were long thought to be minor compounds, usually less than a tenth of a plant’s total.3 In both giant hogweeds angelicin is often the largest single component: in the leaves of giant hogweed, and in the fruit coats of Sosnowsky’s hogweed, where it is also the main agent by which the seed suppresses the growth of other plants.912
The compounds do not wait to be released. In Sosnowsky’s hogweed they are found in the living hairs of the stem and leaf, and as crystals on the surface of the hairs and other cells, where the lightest contact picks them up.13 In the related H. persicum, studied under the name H. laciniatum, the roots of older plants were strongly phototoxic even when dug from frozen ground in December.14
The small native H. sibiricum, by contrast, contains only traces of angelicin: it lacks a working copy of the gene for the first step of the angular branch.8
Biosynthesis
phenylalanine
|
cinnamic acid
| C4H
p-coumaric acid
|
p-coumaroyl-CoA
| C2'H
UMBELLIFERONE
/ \
prenyl on C6 prenyl on C8
(U6DT) (U8DT)
| |
demethylsuberosin osthenol
| |
(+)-marmesin (+)-columbianetin
| psoralen | angelicin
| synthase | synthase
| -> acetone |
PSORALEN ANGELICIN
linear angular
/ \ |
bergaptol xanthotoxol methoxyangelicins:
| | sphondin, pimpinellin
BERGAPTEN XANTHOTOXIN (enzymes not yet known)
(5-MOP) (8-MOP) Two branches from one precursor. Where a prenyl group is attached to umbelliferone decides whether the plant makes linear or angular compounds.
Furanocoumarins are built from the amino acid phenylalanine by way of umbelliferone, a simple coumarin.3 The decisive step is the attachment of a five-carbon prenyl group to umbelliferone, carried out by prenyltransferases of the plastid. Attached at carbon 6, it leads to the linear compounds; at carbon 8, to the angular ones.1516
On the linear branch, the prenylated intermediate is closed into (+)-marmesin, from which psoralen synthase cuts off the side chain in a single step, releasing it as acetone.17 Psoralen is then hydroxylated and methylated into bergapten and xanthotoxin.18 On the angular branch, angelicin synthase converts (+)-columbianetin into angelicin by the same kind of reaction.19 In giant hogweed this step was followed in living leaves.20 The enzymes that make the angular derivatives sphondin and pimpinellin had not been isolated as of 2019.7
Beyond umbelliferone a plant needs only three enzymes to make psoralen, which may explain why the pathway has evolved several times.2 The product is dangerous to its maker: psoralen inactivates one of the plant’s own enzymes early in the pathway. Rue and parsley, which make furanocoumarins, carry versions of the enzyme that are less easily disabled.21
The genome of Sosnowsky’s hogweed, sequenced in 2023, contains 55,106 genes, against the 25,000–35,000 typical of plants. The excess comes not from a doubling of the whole genome but from repeated duplication of individual genes.22 The genome carries candidate genes for every step of the furanocoumarin pathway, several of them in two or three copies.8
Photochemistry
in the dark one photon two photons
(monoadduct) (cross-link)
5' 3' 5' 3' 5' 3'
| | | | | |
A ::::: T A ::::: T A ::::: T
T ::::: A T*::::: A T*::::: A
======= *======= *=======*
A ::::: T A ::::: T A :::::*T
C ::::: G C ::::: G C ::::: G
| | | | | |
3' 5' 3' 5' 3' 5'
the flat molecule its furan end fuses its pyrone end fuses
slips between the with a thymine with the thymine on
base pairs the other strand How a linear furanocoumarin cross-links DNA. An angular one stops at the second panel.
A furanocoumarin in the dark does nothing. Being flat, it slips between the stacked base pairs of DNA. When it absorbs a photon of ultraviolet A, it reacts, through its excited triplet state, with a neighbouring thymine, forming a four-membered ring between one of its double bonds and the thymine’s.23 The reaction is fast: in one psoralen studied in detail it is complete within about 50 microseconds.24
A linear molecule that has bound by its furan end can absorb a second photon and bind by its pyrone end to a thymine on the opposite strand, joining the two strands of the helix together.2523 Such interstrand cross-links block the copying of DNA. The favoured site is a thymine followed by an adenine, 5′-TpA, and runs of alternating A and T are hot spots.2627
Angular furanocoumarins bind once and stop: their bent shape does not allow a second bond, and they form monoadducts only.28 An influential 1983 review held that the angular compounds could not bind DNA at all.3 Photochemical work showed that they do, if only once,28 and skin tests of the same years confirmed that angelicin, sphondin and pimpinellin are phototoxic.29 Furanocoumarins also produce reactive oxygen in light, which damages membranes; how much this contributes to the burn is disputed.3031
The wavelengths that matter lie in the ultraviolet A. For the furanocoumarins of hogweed the skin reaction peaks at 330–335 nm, in the ultraviolet A.32 The injury appears 24 to 72 hours later, followed by darkening of the skin.33 Among the compounds isolated from H. persicum, bergapten was the most phototoxic.32
Medicine
Photochemotherapy
More than 3,500 years ago, healers in Egypt and India treated patches of lost skin colour with the seeds of Ammi majus and Psoralea corylifolia, taken by mouth and followed by sunlight.3435 In 1948 A. M. El Mofty in Egypt reported treating vitiligo with purified xanthotoxin and sunlight.35 In 1974 a group at Harvard gave methoxsalen by mouth, followed by long-wave ultraviolet light, to patients with severe psoriasis; in 21 patients the disease cleared completely. They called the method photochemotherapy, and it became known as PUVA, psoralen plus UVA.36
PUVA was used in thousands of patients for psoriasis, cutaneous lymphoma and more than sixteen other skin diseases, and gave rise to extracorporeal photopheresis, in which blood cells are treated outside the body.434
Cancer
The damage that clears the skin also causes cancer. Methoxsalen with ultraviolet A is classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1); 5-methoxypsoralen is probably carcinogenic (Group 2A); angelicin with UVA, which forms no cross-links, cannot be classified (Group 3).37 In an American cohort of 1,380 psoriasis patients first treated in 1975–76, a quarter developed squamous-cell carcinomas of the skin, 2,973 in all, and the risk rose steeply with the number of treatments.38 The risk of melanoma rose about fifteen years after the first treatment, especially in patients given 250 treatments or more.39
Grapefruit
The grapefruit effect was found by accident. In 1989 a study of alcohol and the blood-pressure drug felodipine, which gave the alcohol in grapefruit juice, found far more felodipine in the blood than expected.40 With grapefruit juice, felodipine reached the blood at 284 per cent of the level reached with water; orange juice had no such effect.41
The cause is two furanocoumarins of the grapefruit, bergamottin and 6′,7′-dihydroxybergamottin. They destroy the enzyme CYP3A4 in the wall of the gut, which would otherwise break down part of each dose before it reached the blood.4243 The enzyme is not switched off but destroyed; the gut must make it anew.44 A grapefruit juice from which the furanocoumarins had been removed did not affect felodipine at all.45 More than 85 drugs are known or expected to interact with grapefruit.5
Ecology and evolution
Defence
Furanocoumarins protect the plants that make them. In 1978 May Berenbaum showed that xanthotoxin was toxic to a caterpillar that feeds on many kinds of plant, and less toxic without ultraviolet light, while its precursor umbelliferone was harmless. She called the plant’s conversion of the one into the other biosynthetic escape.46 The compounds are also made in response to fungal attack, as phytoalexins.47 Defence has a price: in wild parsnip, an induced chemical defence costs the plant photosynthesis and growth.48
Arms race
Specialists caught up. The black swallowtail, a butterfly of the carrot family, is hardly harmed by xanthotoxin, but angelicin reduces its growth and fecundity. Berenbaum and Paul Feeny proposed in 1981 that the angular compounds, found in only a few advanced groups of the family, were a further step, an escalation in a coevolutionary arms race.49 The swallowtail’s enzyme for breaking down furanocoumarins, CYP6B1, is switched on by xanthotoxin in its food,50 and was later found to break down angelicin as well.51
The parsnip webworm, which feeds only on parsnips and hogweeds, keeps up its detoxifying enzymes even when starved of protein, at the expense of its growth.52 In wild parsnip, resistance to the webworm is inherited, but genetic constraints limit the plant’s response and hold the two in what the authors called an evolutionary stalemate.53 When the webworm reached North America in the nineteenth century, the parsnips there, which had grown up without it, became more toxic.54 The webworm also feeds on giant hogweed; in the Netherlands, moths raised on it were smaller than those raised on the native common hogweed.55
Several inventions
The fig makes furanocoumarins with enzymes unrelated to those of the carrot family. Its first committed enzyme evolved from a different ancestor, and its marmesin synthase is a recent invention of its own lineage. The pathway, it appears, has been acquired independently several times.256 Within the carrot family, the angular compounds appear to have evolved after the linear ones.16
See also
- Phytophotodermatitis
- Giant hogweed § Health hazards
- Enemy release hypothesis § Defence
- Heracleum § Chemistry
Footnotes
-
Camm, E.; Buck, H. W. L.; Mitchell, J. C. (1976). “Phytophotodermatitis from Heracleum mantegazzianum”. Contact Dermatitis. 2 (2): 68–72. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1976.tb02987.x. ↩ ↩2
-
Munakata, R.; Kitajima, S.; Nuttens, A.; et al. (2020). “Convergent evolution of the UbiA prenyltransferase family underlies the independent acquisition of furanocoumarins in plants”. New Phytologist. 225 (5): 2166–2182. doi:10.1111/nph.16277. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4
-
Berenbaum, M. (1983). “Coumarins and caterpillars: a case for coevolution”. Evolution. 37 (1): 163–179. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05524.x. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6
-
Pathak, M. A.; Fitzpatrick, T. B. (1992). “The evolution of photochemotherapy with psoralens and UVA (PUVA): 2000 BC to 1992 AD”. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B. 14 (1–2): 3–22. doi:10.1016/1011-1344(92)85080-E. ↩ ↩2
-
Bailey, D. G.; Dresser, G.; Arnold, J. M. O. (2013). “Grapefruit–medication interactions: forbidden fruit or avoidable consequences?”. CMAJ. 185 (4): 309–316. doi:10.1503/cmaj.120951. ↩ ↩2
-
PubChem. Compound records for psoralen (CID 6199), bergapten (CID 2355) and xanthotoxin (CID 4114). National Center for Biotechnology Information. Retrieved 26 September 2026. ↩
-
Bruni, R.; Barreca, D.; Protti, M.; et al. (2019). “Botanical sources, chemistry, analysis, and biological activity of furanocoumarins of pharmaceutical interest”. Molecules. 24 (11): 2163. doi:10.3390/molecules24112163. ↩ ↩2
-
Shtratnikova, V. Yu.; Bogdanov, V. P.; Schelkunov, M. I.; et al. (2025). “Furanocoumarins in two European species of Heracleum: transcriptomic and metabolomic study”. BMC Plant Biology. 25: 1091. doi:10.1186/s12870-025-07042-3. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4
-
Gruľová, D.; Baranová, B.; Eliašová, A.; et al. (2024). “Does the invasive Heracleum mantegazzianum influence other species by allelopathy?”. Plants. 13 (10): 1333. doi:10.3390/plants13101333. ↩ ↩2
-
Pira, E.; Romano, C.; Sulotto, F.; Pavan, I.; Monaco, E. (1989). “Heracleum mantegazzianum growth phases and furocoumarin content”. Contact Dermatitis. 21 (5): 300–303. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1989.tb04747.x. ↩
-
Rysiak, A.; Dresler, S.; Hanaka, A.; et al. (2021). “High temperature alters secondary metabolites and photosynthetic efficiency in Heracleum sosnowskyi”. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 22 (9): 4756. doi:10.3390/ijms22094756. ↩
-
Mishyna, M.; Laman, N.; Prokhorov, V.; Fujii, Y. (2015). “Angelicin as the principal allelochemical in Heracleum sosnowskyi fruit”. Natural Product Communications. 10 (5): 767–770. doi:10.1177/1934578X1501000517. ↩
-
Weryszko-Chmielewska, E.; Chwil, M. (2017). “Localisation of furanocoumarins in the tissues and on the surface of shoots of Heracleum sosnowskyi”. Botany. 95 (11): 1057–1070. doi:10.1139/cjb-2017-0043. ↩
-
Kavli, G.; Volden, G.; Midelfart, K.; Krokan, H.; Prytz, J. O.; Haugsbø, S. (1983). “In vivo and in vitro phototoxicity of different parts of Heracleum laciniatum”. Contact Dermatitis. 9 (4): 269–273. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1983.tb04388.x. ↩
-
Karamat, F.; Olry, A.; Munakata, R.; et al. (2014). “A coumarin-specific prenyltransferase catalyzes the crucial biosynthetic reaction for furanocoumarin formation in parsley”. The Plant Journal. 77 (4): 627–638. doi:10.1111/tpj.12409. ↩
-
Munakata, R.; Olry, A.; Karamat, F.; et al. (2016). “Molecular evolution of parsnip (Pastinaca sativa) membrane-bound prenyltransferases for linear and/or angular furanocoumarin biosynthesis”. New Phytologist. 211 (1): 332–344. doi:10.1111/nph.13899. ↩ ↩2
-
Larbat, R.; Kellner, S.; Specker, S.; et al. (2007). “Molecular cloning and functional characterization of psoralen synthase, the first committed monooxygenase of furanocoumarin biosynthesis”. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 282 (1): 542–554. doi:10.1074/jbc.M604762200. ↩
-
Krieger, C.; Roselli, S.; Kellner-Thielmann, S.; et al. (2018). “The CYP71AZ P450 subfamily: a driving factor for the diversification of coumarin biosynthesis in apiaceous plants”. Frontiers in Plant Science. 9: 820. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00820. ↩
-
Larbat, R.; Hehn, A.; Hans, J.; et al. (2009). “Isolation and functional characterization of CYP71AJ4 encoding for the first P450 monooxygenase of angular furanocoumarin biosynthesis”. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 284 (8): 4776–4785. doi:10.1074/jbc.M807351200. ↩
-
Stanjek, V.; Boland, W. (1998). “Biosynthesis of angular furanocoumarins: mechanism and stereochemistry of the oxidative dealkylation of columbianetin to angelicin in Heracleum mantegazzianum (Apiaceae)”. Helvetica Chimica Acta. 81 (9): 1596–1607. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-2675(19980909)81:9<1596::AID-HLCA1596>3.0.CO;2-F. ↩
-
Gravot, A.; Larbat, R.; Hehn, A.; et al. (2004). “Cinnamic acid 4-hydroxylase mechanism-based inactivation by psoralen derivatives: cloning and characterization of a C4H from a psoralen producing plant, Ruta graveolens, exhibiting low sensitivity to psoralen inactivation”. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 422 (1): 71–80. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2003.12.013. ↩
-
Schelkunov, M. I.; Shtratnikova, V. Yu.; Klepikova, A. V.; et al. (2024). “The genome of the toxic invasive species Heracleum sosnowskyi carries an increased number of genes despite absence of recent whole-genome duplications”. The Plant Journal. 117 (2): 449–463. doi:10.1111/tpj.16500. ↩
-
Diekmann, J.; Theves, I.; Thom, K. A.; Gilch, P. (2020). “Tracing the photoaddition of pharmaceutical psoralens to DNA”. Molecules. 25 (22): 5242. doi:10.3390/molecules25225242. ↩ ↩2
-
Diekmann, J.; Gontcharov, J.; Fröbel, S.; et al. (2019). “The photoaddition of a psoralen to DNA proceeds via the triplet state”. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 141 (34): 13643–13653. doi:10.1021/jacs.9b06521. ↩
-
Dall’Acqua, F.; Marciani, S.; Ciavatta, L.; Rodighiero, G. (1971). “Formation of inter-strand cross-linkings in the photoreactions between furocoumarins and DNA”. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung B. 26 (6): 561–569. doi:10.1515/znb-1971-0613. ↩
-
Sage, E.; Moustacchi, E. (1987). “Sequence context effects on 8-methoxypsoralen photobinding to defined DNA fragments”. Biochemistry. 26 (12): 3307–3314. doi:10.1021/bi00386a010. ↩
-
Boyer, V.; Moustacchi, E.; Sage, E. (1988). “Sequence specificity in photoreaction of various psoralen derivatives with DNA: role in biological activity”. Biochemistry. 27 (8): 3011–3018. doi:10.1021/bi00408a052. ↩
-
Dall’Acqua, F.; Vedaldi, D.; Caffieri, S.; et al. (1984). “Chemical basis of the photosensitizing activity of angelicins”. National Cancer Institute Monographs. 66: 55–60. PMID 6531039. ↩ ↩2
-
Kavli, G.; Midelfart, K.; Raa, J.; Volden, G. (1983). “Phototoxicity from furocoumarins (psoralens) of Heracleum laciniatum in a patient with vitiligo: action spectrum studies on bergapten, pimpinellin, angelicin and sphondin”. Contact Dermatitis. 9 (5): 364–366. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1983.tb04429.x. ↩
-
Pathak, M. A.; Joshi, P. C. (1984). “Production of active oxygen species (¹O₂ and O₂•⁻) by psoralens and ultraviolet radiation (320–400 nm)”. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 798 (1): 115–126. doi:10.1016/0304-4165(84)90018-7. ↩
-
Sage, E.; Le Doan, T.; Boyer, V.; et al. (1989). “Oxidative DNA damage photo-induced by 3-carbethoxypsoralen and other furocoumarins”. Journal of Molecular Biology. 209 (2): 297–314. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(89)90278-7. ↩
-
Kavli, G.; Raa, J.; Johnson, B. E.; Volden, G.; Haugsbø, S. (1983). “Furocoumarins of Heracleum laciniatum: isolation, phototoxicity, absorption and action spectra studies”. Contact Dermatitis. 9 (4): 257–262. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1983.tb04386.x. ↩ ↩2
-
Kavli, G.; Volden, G. (1984). “Phytophotodermatitis”. Photodermatology. 1 (2): 65–75. PMID 6397734. ↩
-
Hönigsmann, H. (2013). “History of phototherapy in dermatology”. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences. 12 (1): 16–21. doi:10.1039/c2pp25120e. ↩ ↩2
-
Hamblin, M. R.; Abrahamse, H. (2020). “Oxygen-independent antimicrobial photoinactivation: type III photochemical mechanism?”. Antibiotics. 9 (2): 53. doi:10.3390/antibiotics9020053. ↩ ↩2
-
Parrish, J. A.; Fitzpatrick, T. B.; Tanenbaum, L.; Pathak, M. A. (1974). “Photochemotherapy of psoriasis with oral methoxsalen and longwave ultraviolet light”. New England Journal of Medicine. 291 (23): 1207–1211. doi:10.1056/NEJM197412052912301. ↩
-
International Agency for Research on Cancer. “Agents classified by the IARC Monographs”. Retrieved 26 September 2026. ↩
-
Stern, R. S.; PUVA Follow-Up Study (2012). “The risk of squamous cell and basal cell cancer associated with psoralen and ultraviolet A therapy: a 30-year prospective study”. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 66 (4): 553–562. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2011.04.004. ↩
-
Stern, R. S.; Nichols, K. T.; Väkevä, L. H. (1997). “Malignant melanoma in patients treated for psoriasis with methoxsalen (psoralen) and ultraviolet A radiation (PUVA)”. New England Journal of Medicine. 336 (15): 1041–1045. doi:10.1056/NEJM199704103361501. ↩
-
Bailey, D. G.; Spence, J. D.; Edgar, B.; Bayliff, C. D.; Arnold, J. M. (1989). “Ethanol enhances the hemodynamic effects of felodipine”. Clinical and Investigative Medicine. 12 (6): 357–362. PMID 2612087. ↩
-
Bailey, D. G.; Spence, J. D.; Munoz, C.; Arnold, J. M. O. (1991). “Interaction of citrus juices with felodipine and nifedipine”. The Lancet. 337 (8736): 268–269. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)90872-M. ↩
-
He, K.; Iyer, K. R.; Hayes, R. N.; et al. (1998). “Inactivation of cytochrome P450 3A4 by bergamottin, a component of grapefruit juice”. Chemical Research in Toxicology. 11 (4): 252–259. doi:10.1021/tx970192k. ↩
-
Schmiedlin-Ren, P.; Edwards, D. J.; Fitzsimmons, M. E.; et al. (1997). “Mechanisms of enhanced oral availability of CYP3A4 substrates by grapefruit constituents”. Drug Metabolism and Disposition. 25 (11): 1228–1233. PMID 9351897. ↩
-
Lown, K. S.; Bailey, D. G.; Fontana, R. J.; et al. (1997). “Grapefruit juice increases felodipine oral availability in humans by decreasing intestinal CYP3A protein expression”. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 99 (10): 2545–2553. doi:10.1172/JCI119439. ↩
-
Paine, M. F.; Widmer, W. W.; Hart, H. L.; et al. (2006). “A furanocoumarin-free grapefruit juice establishes furanocoumarins as the mediators of the grapefruit juice–felodipine interaction”. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 83 (5): 1097–1105. doi:10.1093/ajcn/83.5.1097. ↩
-
Berenbaum, M. (1978). “Toxicity of a furanocoumarin to armyworms: a case of biosynthetic escape from insect herbivores”. Science. 201 (4355): 532–534. doi:10.1126/science.201.4355.532. ↩
-
Tietjen, K. G.; Hunkler, D.; Matern, U. (1983). “Differential response of cultured parsley cells to elicitors from two non-pathogenic strains of fungi. 1. Identification of induced products as coumarin derivatives”. European Journal of Biochemistry. 131 (2): 401–407. doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1983.tb07277.x. ↩
-
Zangerl, A. R.; Arntz, A. M.; Berenbaum, M. R. (1997). “Physiological price of an induced chemical defense: photosynthesis, respiration, biosynthesis, and growth”. Oecologia. 109 (3): 433–441. doi:10.1007/s004420050103. ↩
-
Berenbaum, M.; Feeny, P. (1981). “Toxicity of angular furanocoumarins to swallowtail butterflies: escalation in a coevolutionary arms race?”. Science. 212 (4497): 927–929. doi:10.1126/science.212.4497.927. ↩
-
Cohen, M. B.; Schuler, M. A.; Berenbaum, M. R. (1992). “A host-inducible cytochrome P-450 from a host-specific caterpillar: molecular cloning and evolution”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 89 (22): 10920–10924. doi:10.1073/pnas.89.22.10920. ↩
-
Wen, Z.; Pan, L.; Berenbaum, M. R.; Schuler, M. A. (2003). “Metabolism of linear and angular furanocoumarins by Papilio polyxenes CYP6B1 co-expressed with NADPH cytochrome P450 reductase”. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 33 (9): 937–947. doi:10.1016/S0965-1748(03)00100-0. ↩
-
Berenbaum, M. R.; Zangerl, A. R. (1994). “Costs of inducible defense: protein limitation, growth, and detoxification in parsnip webworms”. Ecology. 75 (8): 2311–2317. doi:10.2307/1940886. ↩
-
Berenbaum, M. R.; Zangerl, A. R.; Nitao, J. K. (1986). “Constraints on chemical coevolution: wild parsnips and the parsnip webworm”. Evolution. 40 (6): 1215–1228. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb05746.x. ↩
-
Zangerl, A. R.; Berenbaum, M. R. (2005). “Increase in toxicity of an invasive weed after reassociation with its coevolved herbivore”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 102 (43): 15529–15532. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507805102. ↩
-
Harvey, J. A.; Ode, P. J.; Gols, R. (2020). “Population- and species-based variation of webworm–parasitoid interactions in hogweeds (Heracleum spp.) in the Netherlands”. Environmental Entomology. 49 (4): 924–930. doi:10.1093/ee/nvaa052. ↩
-
Villard, C.; Munakata, R.; Kitajima, S.; et al. (2021). “A new P450 involved in the furanocoumarin pathway underlies a recent case of convergent evolution”. New Phytologist. 231 (5): 1923–1939. doi:10.1111/nph.17458. ↩