Art. 0015 Rev. 1929

Talk:Monocarpy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Monocarpy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article’s subject.

  • Put new text under old text.
  • Please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~).
  • Be polite, and welcoming to new users. Assume good faith.
  • Wear gloves.
WikiProject Invasive Species This article has been rated Top-importance on the project’s importance scale, and semi-protected against edits by stakeholders.

Postponed or prevented?

The following discussion has been closed. The lead keeps “postpones”. The sources cited give no number of years for which repeated cutting can hold off flowering, and the article will not supply one.

I have added to the lead that regular cutting can keep a hogweed from ever flowering. The source is clear that cutting rosettes “extends their life span by postponing the time of flowering” (Pyšek et al. 2007, p. 123). Renew the postponement every summer and the flowering never comes. No digging, no spraying: patient mowing, and the flowering is put off for good. — Ed. Bernstein (talk) 16:46, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Oppose. Postponed is not prevented. The manual says what the plant does under stress: it postpones flowering “until a time when sufficient reserves are stored” (Nielsen et al. 2005, p. 17). The oldest plant on record waited twelve years on a dry, unmanaged site, and then flowered (Pergl et al. 2006). Every summer you mow, you are mowing a plant that is alive at the root, and vegetative plants “can only be killed by cutting the root” (Pyšek et al. 2007, p. 123). — Rosa L. (talk) 16:52, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Then leave the timing to the plant. By the article’s own sources the “decision” when to flower is a trade-off against “the profit from delayed reproduction” (Pergl et al. 2006). The plant knows its own business. — InvisibleHand (talk) 16:55, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

It does. Output was unrelated to age: the authors read it as a “threshold in the amount of resources” (Pergl et al. 2006, p. 1025), and the manual explains cutting as working by depleting those reserves (Nielsen et al. 2005, pp. 30, 32). Mowing does not abolish the threshold; it makes the plant take longer to reach it. When it gets there, the reserves are “suddenly available for rapid utilization” (Pyšek et al. 2007, p. 307). — Moor (talk) 17:01, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

For the record: I could find no study that measured, year by year, how long repeated cutting holds a hogweed back. Where cutting has been kept up on other monocarps, the record is not encouraging. In Mizoram, where farmers kept cutting the regrowing bamboo culms, the rhizomes still flowered and the fruit littered the ground (Aplin & Lalsiamliana 2010, p. 30). In Ceylon, talipots whose young leaves were cut for umbrellas could take twenty years or more to form a stem (Seifriz 1924, p. 347), which is a delay, not an exemption. — Kingfisher (talk) 17:06, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Then may we at least say “for many years”? — Ed. Bernstein (talk) 17:10, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

For exactly as many years as the root is left alive. That is not a solution. It is a schedule. — Old Mole (talk) 17:12, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Closing. The lead says “postpones”, as the source does; see Size, stress and cutting and Hydra effect. — Catchment Committee (talk) 17:27, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

View source for Monocarpy

Editing is paused during the seeding season. You can view and copy the source of this page.

In other languages

Hogweed.org is held in common in 17 languages. Every edition is translated from the English one.

English Monocarpy
Deutsch Hapaxanthe Pflanze
Français Monocarpie
Español Monocarpismo
Italiano Monocarpico
Português Monocarpia
Polski Roślina monokarpiczna
Nederlands Monocarpisch
Română Monocarpie
Ελληνικά Μονοκαρπικά φυτά
Čeština Monokarpie
Svenska Monokarp
Magyar Monokarpia
Dansk Monokarpe planter
Suomi Kertakukkivuus
Norsk bokmål Monokarpi
Русский Монокарпики